Danny Kruger, MP for East Wiltshire, was closely involved in scrutinising the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill as it passed through the House of Commons. Before it can become law, the Bill will undergo the same process in the House of Lords and is expected to be debated there in September. Read Danny’s reflection below.
"Now, splendidly, everything had become clear. The enemy at last was plain in view, huge and hateful, all disguise cast off. It was the Modern Age in arms."
After this week I feel like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939. The politics of 'progress' has found its fulfilment in the union of two total malignancies: the campaigns to abort babies at full term and to kill old people before their time. Here is our enemy, all disguise cast off.
I've been accused of disguising something myself - my Christian faith. And it's true that while I've never hidden it (see my maiden speech), I didn't parade my faith as the basis of my objection to assisted suicide.
You don't need religious arguments to show this Bill is bad, and many atheists have been brilliant in the battle against it. You just need to actually read the Bill, and the statements of all the professional bodies who work with the elderly and dying. I'm appalled that so many MPs - judging by their asinine speeches - have plainly not done this.
But now that the Bill has passed the Commons, I guess I can come out of the closet and say to the militant anti-Christians who were pushing it - you're not wrong.
I do also object to euthanasia on religious grounds - because the case for euthanasia is itself a religious one. Nothing else explains the failure of its supporters to engage with the detail of the Bill or the practicalities of implementing it.
Support for assisted suicide is an article of faith - faith in the capacity of individual human beings to play the role of God, towards themselves and others.
Christians by contrast think human beings are fallen - weak, selfish, dangerous - so we don't trust them with absolute power. That's why over the centuries, especially in England, the idea developed that the law should protect us from each other, and even from ourselves, and certainly from the state.
In objecting to assisted suicide I was trying to defend this old fashioned idea that the law should protect the vulnerable. And in abandoning this idea we are opening the door to a terrible dystopia.
Not just in the moral sphere. The things our country needs more than anything are more children, and more care for our aging population. The Commons voted this week for the opposite - death to both groups. It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents.
We are ushering in a dangerous new politics, a sort of hedonic utilitarianism in which the convenience of adults is paramount even over the lives of the young and old. This is the pagan philosophy, with its cult of strength, which Christianity banished, but it is now returning.
Maybe I'm exaggerating. But these are apocalyptic times. As the world beyond Britain blows up, as technology rewrites everything, and as our own security, economy and society are increasingly, desperately, precarious - how do we feel about junking the ideas that created and sustained the peace and prosperity of these islands for 1500 years?
What's the alternative story we're going to tell ourselves, in place of the one about us being individually, uniquely valuable but also chronically prone to wrongdoing?
The opposite story, that we're perfect moral beings but that if we're weak or unwanted we will be killed - feels less appealing to me, and certainly less useful to the challenges of the times.
If we are to withstand our enemies, bring our society together, and tame the technium (somehow ensure that human values govern the new age of machines), we are going to need values that are up to the job.
I don't think humanist atheism or progressive liberalism or whatever the new religion should be called, is up to it. Christianity is. Only Christianity is.
***
Here is an extract from Danny’s maiden speech, given in 2019:
“Traditionally we had a sense of this: we are children of God, fallen but redeemed, capable of great wrong while capable of great virtue. Even for those who didn't believe in God there was a sense that our country is rooted in Christianity, that our liberty is derived from the Christian idea of absolute human dignity.
Today these ideas are losing their purchase and so we are trying to find a new set of values to guide us a new language of rights and wrongs and a new idea of identity - based not on our universal inner value or on our membership of a common culture, but on our particular differences. I state this as neutrally as I can because I know that good people are trying hard to make a better world, and I know that Christianity in the Western past was badly stained by violence and injustice. But I'm not sure we should so casually throw away the inheritance of our culture.
There's so much to be positive about. We need a set of values and beliefs to guide us. As we advance at speed into the bewildering world where we are forced to ask the most profound questions about the limits of autonomy and what it means to be human, we may have reason to look about for the old ways and seek wisdom in the old ideas, which are in my view entirely timeless.”
Danny Kruger is the Member of Parliament for East Wiltshire and has been an MP continually since 12 December 2019. Before this, he founded and led two charities, the criminal justice project Only Connect, and West London Zone, for children and young people. He has a D.Phil in history from Oxford University and is the author of On Fraternity: Politics beyond Liberty and Equality (Civitas, 2007) and Covenant: The New Politics of Home, Neighbourhood and Nation (Forum, 2024).
I am also amazed and confused by the poor standard of debate on the assisted suicide Bill and by the lack of any depth of reasoning and thought.
In advance, I had shared with my MP, a supporter of the Bill, an alarming commentary on the situation in Canada sent by a trusted colleague (we share a common hobby).
From: James DeLaurier Emeritus Professor at University of Toronto
Hello friends, family, and colleagues. I’m writing from my bed at Humber River Hospital. On 9 March, I received a one-two punch from a combination of pneumonia and afib that literally put me face down on the floor, barely able to breathe. My daughter April called for an ambulance that whisked me to the receiving area of the hospital.
However, upon my arrival, I had a very disturbing experience. A doctor came to me and stated that because I’m 84, he could make me “comfortable”. Here in Canada that’s a euphemism for legally assisted suicide. I was able to croak out that I write books. He replied “oh, you read books?”, to which I responded: “no, I WRITE books!”. I then flopped back exhausted, hoping that headed off the fast track to eternity.
Susan and April had followed the ambulance to the hospital, but were not at that encounter. However, I’m sure that my fierce wonderful daughter would have ripped him a new orifice. For my part, I wished I had the energy to suggest to “Dr. Comfort” that he perform a certain sexual act upon himself.
As I had stated, euthanasia is legal in Canada. It’s called MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying). It began a decade ago under very tight restrictions. However, these loosened quickly to the point where you can start the process if you are just impoverished or suffering from PTSD. The “slippery slope” occurred so quickly that I’m surprised that Canadians aren’t consistent gold-medal luge champions.
This goes hand-in-hand with a certain death-cult attitude in Canada. I know that this seems strange in clean, friendly, competent (supposedly) slightly goofy Canada. However, it might come as a surprise that there are no legal restrictions on abortion. None. A couple of decades ago, the question of abortion laws was sent to the Canadian Supreme Court; but they tossed this back to the government to deal with. This has sat in legal limbo ever since, and the simple fact is that a doctor could commit an abortion right up to the child’s due date. I’ve been repeatedly assured that no moral doctor would actually do this. However, this seems akin to giving your doctor the legal right to shoot you, at the same time assuring you that he won’t.
The question of abortion rights is the electric third rail in Canadian politics. No politician wants to touch it. However, a survey I read a few years ago stated that the majority of Canadians would welcome a conversation about this. Anyway, in the meantime, watch out! Canada is coming to get you at the beginning and end!
Meanwhile, I receiving exemplary care at the Humber River Hospital, and I am on the mend. It’s going to be a slow process, and it’s been a real scare; but each day is better. However, I do wonder if I should have my Resume tattooed on my chest in case a decision has to be made about me while I’m in a coma.
A word about the Canadian Supreme Court: it’s a collection of political appointees in Santa Claus suits (really! Ask Siri) who make bad decisions.